9 results for 'casenum:"55"'.
J. Barnett sustains the U.S. Department of Commerce’s financial contribution and benefit determinations in this action in which Hyundai Steel Co. challenged the department’s decision to countervail the Korean government’s emissions trading program in the final results of a 2019 administrative review of the “countervailing duty order on hot-rolled steel flat products” from Korea. The department’s specificity determination is remanded.
Court: Court of International Trade, Judge: Barnett , Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 24-55, Categories: International Law
Per curiam, the appellate division finds that attorney Gemma Marilyn Antoine-Belton should be suspended for 60 days for misconduct in the District of Columbia that led to a 30-day suspension and a one-year period of probation. Antoine-Belton, who acknowledged that she failed to provide competent representation while serving as guardian and conservator to an incapacitated adult, was also suspended for 30 days in Pennsylvania for the misconduct and was immediately suspended in Maryland while a disciplinary action remains pending in that state.
Court: New York Appellate Divisions, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 4, 2024, Case #: PM-55-24, Categories: Attorney Discipline
J. Wecht finds that the lower court properly denied a trust termination in this case wherein an alumnus of the Virginia Military Institute asked if its asset-controlling foundation could manage the trust rather than the independent corporate trustee who has been managing it. The burdens borne by the trust do not meet the statutory criteria for termination. Affirmed.
Court: Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Judge: Wecht, Filed On: March 21, 2024, Case #: J-55-2023, Categories: Civil Procedure, Trusts, Wills / Probate
J. Molter finds that the court of appeals properly vacated theft convictions entered on charges that defendant continued to work remotely in serving as county commissioner after ceasing to reside in the county as required because evidence does not indicate defendant had reason to believe she was receiving pay improperly. Affirmed.
Court: Indiana Supreme Court, Judge: Molter, Filed On: February 15, 2024, Case #: 24S‐CR‐55, Categories: Evidence, Theft
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Gravois finds that defendant was properly convicted as a principal to second degree murder based on the admission of evidence of the content of two 911 calls. In this case, the information relayed to the the 911 operators was necessary to resolve an ongoing emergency of hearing gunshots and people fleeing the scene of the gunshots. The 911 calls were not testimonial because the conversations between the callers and 911 operators were not in formal settings, but in the immediate aftermath of the incident and before the police arrived on the scene. Therefore, the admission of the calls did not violate defendant's right to confrontation. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Gravois, Filed On: November 15, 2023, Case #: 23-KA-55, Categories: Confrontation, Evidence, Murder
Per curiam, the Vermont Supreme Court finds that the trial court properly dismissed a defamation case and awarded attorney fees in favor of the reporter and newspaper. The reporter published an article regarding the testimony about the individual's physical violence toward a witness. The individual did not raise or respond to the arguments, thereby failing to show he preserved his claims. Affirmed.
Court: Vermont Supreme Court, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: September 15, 2023, Case #: 23-AP-55, Categories: Defamation
J. Patterson finds the appellate division properly allowed the police detective to narrate surveillance video from a nearby building showing defendant firing a gun at a police officer in an attempted murder. The narration did not need to be excluded because most of it pertained to the role of the video in the investigation of the crime scene, and the error in allowing narration of the muzzle flash was harmless because defendant admitted he was the person in the video. Affirmed.
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court, Judge: Patterson , Filed On: August 2, 2023, Case #: A-55-21, Categories: Murder, Identification